Skip to content

OADP-6293 kopia support #95647

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

shdeshpa07
Copy link
Contributor

@shdeshpa07 shdeshpa07 commented Jul 7, 2025

Jira

Added note about Kopia support

Version

  • OCP 4.13 → OCP 4.20

Preview

QE Review

  • QE has approved this change.

Signed-off-by: Shruti Deshpande <shdeshpa@redhat.com>
@shdeshpa07
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label OADP

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added OADP Label for all OADP PRs size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 7, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 7, 2025

@shdeshpa07: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@shdeshpa07
Copy link
Contributor Author

@weshayutin @stillalearner - Could you please review the note added in the section? Thanks.

Copy link
Member

@shubham-pampattiwar shubham-pampattiwar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 7, 2025
Copy link

@stillalearner stillalearner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@shdeshpa07
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jul 9, 2025
@eromanova97
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label peer-review-needed

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Jul 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@eromanova97 eromanova97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Jul 9, 2025
@shdeshpa07
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jul 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shdeshpa07 FYI 4.13 is out of maintenance. We only backport to 4.13 if we are on the way to 4.12. Since this is for 4.13+, I will cherrypick to 4.14+. If this change also belongs in 4.12, let me know and I will backport to 4.12-4.13 also.

/remove-label merge-review-in-progress
/remove-label merge-review-needed

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat merged commit 82e2581 into openshift:main Jul 15, 2025
2 checks passed
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Jul 15, 2025
@jeana-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #96135

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #96136

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #96137

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #96138

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #96139

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #96140

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #96141

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@shdeshpa07
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM

@shdeshpa07 FYI 4.13 is out of maintenance. We only backport to 4.13 if we are on the way to 4.12. Since this is for 4.13+, I will cherrypick to 4.14+. If this change also belongs in 4.12, let me know and I will backport to 4.12-4.13 also.

/remove-label merge-review-in-progress /remove-label merge-review-needed

Hi @jeana-redhat - Thank you for merging the PR. The OADP operator is still supported on 4.13 and not anymore on 4.12. So yes, if it's okay, I would request you to cherry pick to 4.13 only. 4.12 is out of maintenance for OADP too. Here is the link for OpenShift APIs for Data Protection (OADP) vs OCP support versions. We, on the OADP team, often have to refer to this support matrix to get our versions correct. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 branch/enterprise-4.20 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. OADP Label for all OADP PRs peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants